European Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Nation Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Issues

Europea<span id="more-1331"></span>n Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Nation Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Issues

The European Commission’s Harrie Temmink, who told ICE the other day that EU-wide online gambling legislation would maybe not occur in his lifetime ‘or the next.’

The European Commission (EC) has abandoned the idea of a pan-European regulatory framework for online gambling, accepting that each member states largely oppose synchronizing their Internet gaming laws. The move interestingly mirrors similar issues in america, where states’ rights vs. federal dictates are becoming a battle that is ongoing the iGaming wars.

Talking at last week’s International Casino Exhibition in London (ICE), Harrie Temmink told the industry emphatically that the EC was not taking care of sector-specific legislation in gambling.

‘The Commission is not proposing it and will perhaps not propose it,’ he said. ‘Not in my lifetime or the following.’

Temmink leads the gambling team product and chairs the EC’s Expert Group on Gambling Services.

This may be a far cry from the EC’s previous stance. In 2011, Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier proposed a framework that is eu-wide to protecting consumers and citizens, preventing fraudulence, and maintaining the integrity of activities.

EU Action Plan

Barnier’s view at that time was that ‘the prevailing regulatory, societal and technical [online gambling] issues in the EU’ could never be ‘tackled adequately by member states individually.’

‘This is especially true given the cross-border measurement of on the web gambling,’ he said in 2012, with regards to had been established that the EC would prepare an ‘action plan’ to simplify the regulation associated with sector and encourage cooperation between member states.

The EC frowned on the regulatory actions that had been taken in France, Italy, and Spain, which saw those markets ring-fenced and operators taxed at a rate that is high in obvious conflict with EU ideals of free motion of services between member states.

Barnier’s plan wasn’t proposing just one licensing that is EU, but rather had the goal of ensuring that member states adopted its eyesight for a far more liberal regulatory landscape across Europe. Member states that declined to play ball would be sanctioned, then in Barnier’s vision.

But Barnier left the post in 2014, and his successor, Günther Oettinger, seems less zealous about pushing the cause and more resigned to regulation that is leaving individual jurisdictions.

More Fragmented than Ever

As Temmink explained, ‘I can assure you that whenever we proposed legislation on gambling, in the first conference with the Council, we would have 26 out of 28 member states that would be fiercely opposed to the proposal.

‘It will be committing suicide,’ he added.

Since Barnier outlined his plan in 2012, a wave of brand new legislation has spread across European countries, and numerous licensing that is new have sprung up, through the UK to Portugal. Europe has become also less coordinated on the iGaming front, plus the fragmented regulatory landscape proves a greater challenge to operators than ever.

‘Operators need to have a license for the country that is specific which they provide games, without having to be able to count on the recognition of licenses between one European country and another,’ said Temmink. ‘For their part is for the Member States to make sure a system that is non-discriminatory of licenses.’

Nevada Voters Courted by Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Democratic Caucus Is Key

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are focused on reaching as numerous Nevada voters as you possibly can prior to the Silver State caucuses on Feb. 23rd in what’s shaping up to become a make-or-break point into the Democratic campaign. (Image: Jim Young/Reuters)

Nevada voters are the focal point for both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’ campaigns appropriate now, as the two Democratic presidential nominees attempt to persuade as numerous last-minute voters to vote for them before this week’s February caucus that is 23rd.

The Silver State had long been thought to be her roadblock to stop any Bernie Sanders momentum after Clinton’s narrow victory in Iowa, followed by a hefty defeat in New Hampshire. She once held a lead that is nearly 50-point her challengers, but Sanders’ grassroots movement has severely tightened the race, with numerous analysts now believing Nevada is up for grabs.

Clinton and Sanders each spent the week-end making stops around the state. Sanders campaigned in Reno on Saturday, then Las Vegas on Sunday, while their opponent met with voters in many areas round the gaming mecca throughout the weekend.

The two Democrats concluded the weekend on Sunday at the Victory Missionary Baptist Church in Las Vegas, a congregation largely made up of African-Americans.

‘we send a profound message to the entire country, and that message is that the people of this country will no longer accept establishment politics,’ Sanders said during his brief remarks if we can win here in Nevada.

Clinton responded to Sanders with a relative line as vague as Bernie’s plan of exactly how he will fund his utopian eyesight.

‘I am maybe not a single issue candidate,’ Clinton said. ‘ Because if we were going to achieve everything about banks and money and politics, would that final end racism?’

Say what now?

Nevada Key State in Runoff

Whenever Sanders officially announced his decision to run for the presidency in May, the so-called ‘Clinton machine’ was currently planning to work in Nevada. Volunteers were making hundreds of daily phone calls, going door-to-door, and obtaining endorsements from key state and local leaders.

The Vermont senator didn’t have much of a possibility, at least according to pundits that are political.

Fast-forward nine months, and Clinton just canceled an event in Florida this week to stay the course in Nevada and shake every hand, ascend each phase, and grasp every microphone she can before Nevadans head to caucus on Saturday.

Nevada has a long history of being a swing state in the general presidential election, and its constituents have actually a nearly perfect record of voting for the ultimate winner. Since 1912, Nevada has correctly picked the next president, except for in 1976, whenever Nevada went to Gerald Ford over Jimmy Carter.

A win in Nevada for Clinton would be anticipated, while a win for Sanders pull down exactly what would perhaps function as the biggest political upset in modern history.

Neck-in-Neck towards the Finish

Nevada hosts the gambling epicenter of the United States, so possibly it’s appropriate that there is little evidence that is statistical run on in determining which candidate will win on Saturday.

The stark reality is that wagering on Clinton or Sanders is equivalent to gambling on black or red. Probably the most poll that is recent TargetPoint, the very first governmental data on the competition since late December, has Clinton and Sanders tied 45-45.

Scalia Death Further Stirs the Pot

Including to your intensity of it all, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away on Saturday in Texas of apparent causes that are natural the chronilogical age of 79. Appointed to your bench by President Reagan in 1986, the consistently conservative judge’s death leaves a vacancy on the greatest court that is already causing more governmental divide between Republicans and Democrats.

A host of names have been tossed around, including Nevada that is current Governor Sandoval (R). A welcomed compromise to both conservative and liberal congressional leaders though Sandoval’s GOP label might make him seem unlikely for an Obama endorsement, his pro-choice and pro-immigration views could make the first Silver State governor of Hispanic heritage.

Nevada Gaming Regulator Michonne Ascuaga Resigns Over Alleged Sparks Nugget Improprieties

Michonne Ascuaga, who has resigned from the Nevada Gaming Commission in the wake of the news that a property she formerly managed with her household, the Sparks Nugget in north Nevada, is being investigated for lax anti-money controls that are laundering. (Image:

Michonne Ascuaga has resigned from her post in the Nevada Gaming Commission, following the revelation of alleged financial improprieties at the Sparks Nugget, the casino in northern Nevada that she handled for 16 years.

The Nugget has been examined by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) over allegations so it did not comply with financial laws during Ascuaga’s tenure, and neglected to ascertain an effective anti-money laundering program.

The investigation found light in a court filing week that is last as element of a longstanding contractual lawsuit brought by the Ascuaga family up against the casino’s new owners, Wolfhound Holdings, the private investment team that purchased the home in 2013.

Sandoval Unaware of Investigation

A spokeswoman for Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval 888 casino main lobby said that Sandoval was unaware associated with research when he appointed Ascuaga towards the Gaming Commission panel last April.

‘Michonne Ascuaga has served the Nevada Gaming Commission well,’ had written Brian Sandoval in accepting the resignation. ‘I admire her and wish to recognize her family’s long history as leaders into the video gaming industry.

‘I appreciate that she has put the credibility and reputation of this Gaming Commission first,’ he added. ‘Michonne is a consummate professional and will continue to be a leader in our community.’

Ascuaga has claimed within an statement that is official she ‘did not purposely hold back information from the governor.’

‘The Sparks Nugget was informed in November 2013 by the Department of Treasury that the Department ended up being investigating she added whether it was appropriate to impose civil penalties for possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations. ‘The matter arose from an audit-type examination conducted by the IRS during the casino in 2010. It was all disclosed immediately towards the buyer.’

Ascuaga Lawsuit

Its alleged that the Nugget will be investigated for laxity in its reporting and record-keeping requirements. By law, all businesses must file a Currency Transaction Report on all deals over $10,000, and report any suspicious activity to FinCEN, as a way of guarding against money-laundering.

Ascuaga may be the daughter of John L. Ascuaga, the son of the Basque shepherd who owned the Nugget for over 50 years before its sale to Wolfhound. The Ascuaga family members believes it’s still owed $500,000 underneath the purchase and purchase agreement of the Nugget.

Ascuaga said she was resigning ‘out of deep respect for the Nevada Gaming Commission also to not allow myself to become an unnecessary distraction from the important regulatory oversight work it does.’

0 ответы


Хотите присоединиться к обсуждению?
Не стесняйтесь вносить свой вклад!

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *